Know more

Our use of cookies

Cookies are a set of data stored on a user’s device when the user browses a web site. The data is in a file containing an ID number, the name of the server which deposited it and, in some cases, an expiry date. We use cookies to record information about your visit, language of preference, and other parameters on the site in order to optimise your next visit and make the site even more useful to you.

To improve your experience, we use cookies to store certain browsing information and provide secure navigation, and to collect statistics with a view to improve the site’s features. For a complete list of the cookies we use, download “Ghostery”, a free plug-in for browsers which can detect, and, in some cases, block cookies.

Ghostery is available here for free: https://www.ghostery.com/fr/products/

You can also visit the CNIL web site for instructions on how to configure your browser to manage cookie storage on your device.

In the case of third-party advertising cookies, you can also visit the following site: http://www.youronlinechoices.com/fr/controler-ses-cookies/, offered by digital advertising professionals within the European Digital Advertising Alliance (EDAA). From the site, you can deny or accept the cookies used by advertising professionals who are members.

It is also possible to block certain third-party cookies directly via publishers:

Cookie type

Means of blocking

Analytical and performance cookies

Realytics
Google Analytics
Spoteffects
Optimizely

Targeted advertising cookies

DoubleClick
Mediarithmics

The following types of cookies may be used on our websites:

Mandatory cookies

Functional cookies

Social media and advertising cookies

These cookies are needed to ensure the proper functioning of the site and cannot be disabled. They help ensure a secure connection and the basic availability of our website.

These cookies allow us to analyse site use in order to measure and optimise performance. They allow us to store your sign-in information and display the different components of our website in a more coherent way.

These cookies are used by advertising agencies such as Google and by social media sites such as LinkedIn and Facebook. Among other things, they allow pages to be shared on social media, the posting of comments, and the publication (on our site or elsewhere) of ads that reflect your centres of interest.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses CAS and PHP session cookies and the New Relic cookie for monitoring purposes (IP, response times).

These cookies are deleted at the end of the browsing session (when you log off or close your browser window)

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) uses the XiTi cookie to measure traffic. Our service provider is AT Internet. This company stores data (IPs, date and time of access, length of the visit and pages viewed) for six months.

Our EZPublish content management system (CMS) does not use this type of cookie.

For more information about the cookies we use, contact INRA’s Data Protection Officer by email at cil-dpo@inra.fr or by post at:

INRA
24, chemin de Borde Rouge –Auzeville – CS52627
31326 Castanet Tolosan CEDEX - France

Dernière mise à jour : Mai 2018

Menu Logo Principal AgroParisTech

Welcome to ECOSYS

UMR ECOSYS - Ecologie fonctionnelle et écotoxicologie des agroécosystèmes

RL2. Evaluation of the effects of the contaminants on the organisms and their functions

  • Biomarkers/bioindicators. Biomarkers and biological tests have been developed on i) oligochetes (earthworms and enchytraeids), from sub-individual to population level and ii) microorganisms, mainly at the community level. These organisms are deeply involved in soil functions (i.e. organic matter turnover, biogeochemical and nutrient cycles), and thus being relevant ecological and ecotoxicological models. Various endpoints have been investigated in relation with biochemical and cellular state and also their growth, behavior and activities. The importance of using representative species in ecotoxicological tests of pesticides have been underlined, due to significant differences in sensitivity to pesticides among earthworm species (Pelosi et al., 2013, 2014, 201;, Rombke et al., 2017). The observed difference in sensitivity can be explained by different ecological traits, relating to feeding activity and behavior that could influence the route of exposure to contaminants.
    Individual scale cannot be applied to the soil microbial compartment, while microorganisms provide numerous soil functions and have short-term response to environmental changes. Several indicators of the soil quality were thus developed in a specific or generic way through descriptive approaches. In order to have proxies of these functions, bioassay based on enzymatic activities of the whole soil or specific microbial groups were chosen and developed. However, in an ecotoxicological point of view, many microbial or enzymatic activities were poorly specific or sensitive to the contamination, being poorly robust to confounding factors (i.e. organic matter content or soil pH) and they are supported by a wild diversity of microorganisms (high functional redundancy). Thus for more specific concerns about exposure of the microbial communities to contaminants, the PICT approach have been developed due to the specificity of underlying mechanisms of response to a class of contaminant (i.e. community tolerance acquisition). It appeared as a suitable tool to highlight long term effect or recurrent exposure to a given contaminant. We developed several microbial bioassays with different endpoints depending on the contaminants and its modes of action (i.e soil algae assay for herbicides, nitrification assay for metals and antibiotics, Crouzet and Berard, 2017). A main result in relation with organic waste recycling showed no impact of ABs and TE on soil microbial communities, in long term field experiments (CEMABS project). 
  • Long-term relationship fate-exposition-effect. We worked on the long-term effects where the residual but ongoing exposition to contaminants is hypothesized to decrease with time until sublethal levels of bioavailable contaminants for organisms. Confounding factors are thus expected to have greater importance. In such context, we showed that the classical indicators based on the concept of toxicity are not adapted because not enough robust to confounding factors, little sensitive showing no effect, and non-pertinent to integrate the adaptation capacity of the organisms and the communities (change in the community structures associated or not to functional redundancy). In the field and at the scale of the microbial community, the application of the PICT concept allowed to assess that chronical low doses exposition of one contaminant induced a functional tolerance that could be assessed in the laboratory (CEMABS project). Results are consistent with the fact that even on the long-term selection pressure does exist and that the contaminant is still bioavailable while no effects can be simply shown.
  • Choice of biological models and observation in natura: A large work was done to better evaluate the relevance of our ecological  models used  in ecotoxicology. More specifically, we evaluated both the sensitivity of ubiquitous earthworms found in agricultural soils compared to those used in homologation tests (Pelosi et al., 2013), and the interest of using Enchytraeids as bioindicators of anthropic disturbances or practices of agricultural management (Pelosi and Römbke, 201;, Römbke et al., 2017) (Fig. 20). We were also interested in producing data evaluating the differences in sensitivity to various contaminants between earthworms and Enchytraeids, at the biological scale of population and communities, issued from comparisons of observations in the field and ex situ (Bart et al., 2017; Amossé et al., 2018, ANSES project). We also initiated studies at the spatial scale of landscapes to assess the impact of semi-natural vegetation features on the transfer of pesticides and the related accumulation in various compartments linked to the food chain including soil, earthworms, carabidaes and micromammals) (RESCAPE and PING projects; Bertrand and Pelosi, 2017).
  • Modeling and risk assessment. In order to evaluate the impact of contaminants on the ecological functions fulfilled by earthworms, i.e. the non-intentional effects on contaminants, we adopted a strategy aiming at conducting in parallel laboratory and field experiments. These experiments were used to acquire data on the life cycle of the chosen earthworm and compute a bioenergetic model in the absence then in the presence of contaminant (Bart et al., 2017; 2018). New data, especially in terrestrial ecotoxicology were thus obtained on impact of pesticides on the reproduction and on the health of the following generations, as well as the influence of the age of the earthworm when exposed. The data are then used to parametrize a biological model coupled to a toxicocinetic-toxicodynamic model that will give access to the impact on specific ecological functions linked for example to the C or N cycles (ANSES project).